The Effect of Soil Compaction and Soil Types on Infiltration Rates in Rain Gardens
By: Brianne Labno & Heidi Runde

 

Abstract
Introduction
Map
Methods
Results
Discussion

PDF File

Abstract:
Rain gardens are a very important part of the overall health of the Lake Wingra watershed. Without rain gardens, stormwater carries much of the pollutants generated in the watershed directly into Lake Wingra, and this water has less opportunity to recharge the groundwater aquifer. Soil type is an important dimension of rain garden design, because different soils allow different amounts of water to infiltrate and recharge the groundwater. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the infiltration rates of different soil types in Edgewood’s rain gardens. The rain gardens we tested on the Edgewood campus were the Mazzuchelli rain garden, the rain garden north of the Regina parking lot, and three locations within the large rain garden behind the Edgedome. Our hypothesis was that the infiltration rates would be higher in the rain garden outside of Mazzuchelli, because of its sandier, less compact soil. We measured the infiltration rates of soil from these different locations under different conditions, two in field tests and one in the lab. We also measured the soil compactness and the soil texture. The results from these series of tests support our hypothesis that the rain garden outside of Mazzuchelli has higher infiltration rates as a result of both its soil type and its level of compaction. The effects of soil compaction and soil types have many implications on rain gardens and the design of rain gardens.

Back to top

Introduction:
Rain gardens are an important part of the overall health of the watershed because they capture runoff from surfaces like rooftops and parking lots. Rain gardens replace areas of lawn and are planted with diverse wildflowers and other native vegetation. The rain gardens fill with a few inches of water and allow the water to slowly filter into ground rather than running off into the storm drains (University of Wisconsin Extension, 2004).  Because pavement and buildings can’t soak up the water that falls onto these surfaces, the water is carried away down sidewalks and streets and eventually into the storm drains where it is then carried into larger bodies of water, such as lakes, rivers and streams. Not only is the water carried down this path, but it also carries the pollution with it. A watershed is a land area that drains into a lake or river. Runoff on the Edgewood campus originates from Monroe Street or falls onto the roofs of the buildings and then flows onto the parking lot where it eventually flows into Lake Wingra. From Lake Wingra, it then flows to larger bodies of water like Lake Monona and in time it will flow into the Mississippi. Rain gardens are effective in preventing some of this stormwater pollution from being carried into the streams, because they can fill with a few inches of water and then slowly infiltrate into the soil. Rain gardens allow 30% more water to be infiltrated into the soil than a normal piece of land (University of Wisconsin-Extension, 2002).

Although the rain gardens are a very effective tool for absorbing stormwater the types of soil that are found in rain gardens determine how much water can be absorbed into the soil. There are three main particles, which make up different soil types; clay, sand, and silt. The ratio of sand, silt, and clay determines the soils’ ability to hold moisture and nutrients.  Our watershed project is designed to find how the different soil types in the rain gardens around campus affect the infiltration rate of water in the soil. Our hypothesis for this experiment is that the rain garden outside of Mazzuchelli will have higher infiltration rates as a result of both its soil type and its level of compaction. To test this hypothesis we came up with a series of tests to measure different aspects of the soil under certain conditions.

Back to top

Map of Rain Gardens Tested

Back to top

Methods
Double Ring Infiltrometer 
  • Measures the infiltration rate of the water into the soil.
  • We filled the outer ring with water so that when we put the water in the inner ring it would infiltrate down into the soil rather then spread out to the surrounding soil.
  • Next, we filled the inner ring with water and measured the amount of time it took for the water to completely infiltrate into the soil.

Hole Infiltration
  • Measures the infiltration rate, but it removes the top layer of soil.
  • We filled the hole with water and took measurements how long it took for the water to be absorbed into the soil.
 
Soil Compaction
  • Measures the compactness of the soil.
  • We pushed the soil compaction tester into the ground and measured the point when it changed compaction levels.
Laboratory Infiltration  

 

  • Measures the infiltration rate of the soil, but eliminates the compactness of the soil as a factor.
  • We measured the time it took for 225 ml of water to pass through 150 grams of soil.

Soil Texture by Feel
  • Determines the soil type.
  • The length of the ribbon made by the soil and its texture determine the type of soil.
 

Back to top

Results
From the Double Ring Infiltrometer test we found that the Mazzuchelli Rain Garden had the fastest infiltration rate of 9 min 48 sec. The Large Rain Garden Campus and the Large Rain Garden Middle had very even rates.
In the Hole Infiltration test water infiltrated at all three sites at a steady pace, however Mazzuchelli was once again much faster at infiltrating the water into the soil.
In the Soil Compaction test the Mazzuchelli rain garden was the least compact soil, which means that it is able to absorb and retain water releasing it slowly and allows for more plant growth.
The Laboratory Infiltration test found that in the Large Rain Garden near Sonderegger the water did not pass through at all in the laboratory infiltration test. It sat for over 24 hours and still no water passed through into the beaker. The water did seep into the soil, but did not pass through it. When we took the device apart and removed the soil it felt very sticky and thick. The other four locations had relatively equal amounts of water that soaked into the soil and passed through the soil.

 

Length of Ribbon (inches)

Feel of Soil

Results:  Soil Type

Large Rain Garden Campus School

1 ¾

Smooth

Silty Clay Loam

Large Rain Garden Center

1 ½

Smooth

Silty Clay Loam

Large Rain Garden Sonderegger

2 ¼

Smooth

Clay

Mazzuchelli

1

Very Gritty

Sandy Loam

Regina Parking Lot

1 ½

Gritty

Sandy Clay Loam

 
The Soil Texture test revealed that clay soils that were found in the Large Rain Garden Sonderegger had slower infiltration rates than the Mazzuchelli Rain Garden, which is a sandy soil type.

Back to top

Discussion:
Our watershed project was designed to test how the different soil types in the rain gardens around campus affect the infiltration rate of water in the soil. Our hypothesis for this experiment was that the rain garden outside of Mazzuchelli would have higher infiltration rates as a result of both its soil type and its level of compaction. The results from our tests support our hypothesis, as the infiltration rates were faster in the rain garden outside of Mazzuchelli.

These tests show that the soils with the higher sand ratios had faster infiltration rates and the soils with higher clay ratios infiltrated much more slowly.  The Mazzuchelli Rain Garden has a high concentration of sand in its soil, so it makes sense that it had the fastest infiltration rates in the tests.

The Large Rain Garden Middle is a Silty Clay Loam and the Large Rain Garden Sonderegger is Clay. Knowing this we are able to see that although the compaction levels are the same in each of these rain gardens, it is the type of soil that likely plays a major role in how the water infiltrates into the soil, because the clay soil did not allow any water to pass through it.

Back to top