Department of Natural Science Appeals Procedure
Preamble
We are aware that the formulation of guidelines and procedures
governing academic appeals is an issue involving the very nature of
academic freedom. Thus, any appeal and subsequent decisions concerning
that appeal must be treated with the greatest concern for maintaining
that freedom.
Membership of the Academic Appeals Committee
The Academic Appeals Committee of the Department of Natural Science
shall be comprised of two student members and three faculty members. One
faculty member shall act as chairperson of the committee and shall be
elected by the members of the committee. The committee shall be
constituted by September 15 of each academic year.
Student Members
Student members of the Committee will be chosen from those students
who express interest. Notice will be posted at the beginning of the
academic year. If more than two students are interested they will be
chosen by lot. Students on academic probation shall not be eligible for
membership. If any student feels they have a conflict of interest they
may withdraw from the Committee.
Faculty Members
Faculty members shall be chosen from those who are interested. If
more than three are interested, they will be chosen by vote of the
Department. If any member of the Committee is involved in a grievance,
that member shall not serve and the Department shall select a
replacement member. Members who wish to excuse themselves because of
conflict of interest may do so, the Department shall select a
replacement member.
Role of the Chairperson
The Chairperson of the Committee shall act as a facilitator for any
meeting or proceeding and shall only vote in the case of a tie decision.
Examples of Possible Grounds for an Appeal
A student may consider the following as examples of grounds for an
appeal:
- Error in computation of grade
- Clearly documented extenuating circumstances during the semester
- Questions involving academic dishonesty (see link to policy at
bottom of web page)
Procedure
If any student thinks he or she has a grievance in any matter pertaining
to the Department of Natural Science not considered in standing or
Special Committee of the College, he or she may petition the Department
of Natural Science for redress. The following shall be the procedure for
due process for any such grievance:
Process for Petition
- A student seeking redress must initiate the process by
approaching the Chairperson of the Department and obtaining a
Statement of Grievance Instructor/Student Communication Form
(Appendix A) and a copy of the appeals procedure.
- The student will then clearly state their grievance or
complaint on the form and then present the completed form to the
Department Chair, who will date it and pass it on to the
instructor. The instructor shall have 10 working days to respond
to the complaint in written form, and return a copy to the
student and Department Chair. Any additional documents submitted
by either the student or instructor shall be considered part of
the Statement of Grievance Instructor/Student Communication
Form. During this initial exchange, both parties are to explain
their respective positions to each other. If no agreement is
reached the student may contact the Department Chairperson. The
Department Chair may either refer the matter directly to the
Academic Appeals Committee of the Natural Science Department or
meet with the student, instructor, and advocates in an attempt
to resolve the matter. This meeting shall occur within 10
working days of the students contact with the Department Chair.
If no resolution is reached, the matter will be referred to the
Academic Appeals Committee of the Natural Science Department by
the Department Chair.
- The student seeking redress shall submit to the Chairperson
of the Academic Appeals Committee of the Natural Science
Department a copy of the completed Statement of Grievance
Instructor/Student Communication Form and any accompanying
documents and a petition setting forth in detail the following:
a) the nature of the grievance and the names of the individuals
involved;
b) a suggestion as to what might constitute appropriate
redress of the grievance;
c) any additional information that the petitioner deems
appropriate.
- All parties involved may request an advisor, or other
advocate, to assist and advise in the preparation of the
petition and/or to attend any meeting or proceeding in regard to
the petition.
- Appeals shall be initiated no later than 30 days after the
beginning of the next full semester following that in which the
grievance question occurred.
- The Chairperson of the Committee shall submit copies of the
petition to the Committee and the individuals cited in the
petition and the advocates. Within 10 working days of the
receipt of the petition the Chairperson shall call a meeting of
the Committee to consider the petition. At the time of this
meeting, the Committee shall determine by majority vote whether
or not the alleged circumstances in the petition warrant further
investigation. Submission of a petition shall not automatically
entail investigation thereof.
a) If the Committee determines
that the alleged circumstances do not warrant further
investigation, the Committee shall report within 5 working days
of the initial meeting to all parties involved. The report will
be sent to all parties involved by certified mail to ensure
receipt. The petitioner shall then have an additional 10 working
days beyond receipt of the report to submit an amended petition.
b) If the Committee determines that the alleged circumstances
warrant further investigation, the Committee shall ask all
parties and/or their advocates involved to present any evidence
that they deem appropriate to the petition. All parties who are
involved in the grievance petition shall be asked to have
evidence ready for presentation at a second meeting to be held
within 10 working days of the decision.
If any appeal is concerned with academic evaluation of a
student, the student shall sign a waiver permitting the
introduction of his or her class work. This is to include
such items as tests, term papers, laboratory reports, etc.,
which the Committee may need to make a determination in the
case. No work of a student shall be submitted to the
Committee without such a written waiver.
After the above meeting the Committee, at its discretion,
shall determine whether or not further investigation is
warranted and shall have the right to request that all
parties supply further evidence, which the Committee deems
appropriate. Any third meeting must be held within 10
working days of the second meeting.
If the Committee determines that further investigation is
not necessary, the Committee shall submit a written report
of its findings and recommendations to all parties involved.
Every effort shall be made to reach consensus of the
Committee members on the recommendations. All decisions of
the Committee shall be determined by majority vote. In the
event of a tie decision, the Chairperson shall first ask the
Committee to determine whether further investigation is
warranted in order to break the tie. If a majority vote of
the Committee affirms that further investigation is
warranted, the Committee shall request that all parties
supply further evidence, which the Committee deems
appropriate. If a majority vote of the Committee affirms
that further investigation is not warranted, the Chairperson
shall cast the tie-breaking vote.
- The Committee shall prepare a written report on its
findings and recommendations at the final meeting. This
report shall be submitted to all parties involved within two
working days of reaching a decision. All parties shall have
10 working days to respond to the report in writing.
- Within 15 working days of providing a copy of its report
to the parties involved, the Committee shall forward a copy
of the report and any responses from the parties involved to
the Chairperson of the Natural Science Department and the
Academic Dean.
Committee Proceeding
- Any proceedings of the Committee in which evidence
is presented shall be taped.
- The deliberations of the Committee will not be
taped.
- These tapes shall accompany the written report and
be submitted to the Department Chair and the Academic
Dean.
Edgewood College Academic Honesty Policy